In an increasingly complex investment landscape, Anna Dunn Tabke, CFA, CAIA, founder and president of Leita Advisory, led the webinar "Beyond Performance: Governance, Alignment, and Communication in a More Complex Investment Portfolio" as part of the Philanthropy Southeast 2026 Virtual Investing Series on October 8. Joining her was Anne Davis, president of The Christy-Houston Foundation, Inc., and a trustee of the Murfreesboro Community Investment Trust.
What is your job under your investment governance model?
What does that model require to work?
Why governance needs more attention now
A foundation committed to existing in perpetuity faces the challenge of generating returns that cover both spending and inflation. This typically means a target of around CPI + 5% annually. Achieving this benchmark has become increasingly complex. For example, in fiscal 1999, the average U.S. college and university endowment allocated about 8% to alternatives such as private equity, venture capital, hedge funds, real estate, and commodities. By fiscal 2025, that figure had grown to approximately 30%.
Five Takeaways
1. Know which decisions you own
Understanding different approaches to investment management is essential for foundations, as it shapes how they steward their assets. Foundations usually get investment help in one of three ways, and many blend them:
Internal investment team: Investment staff make all portfolio decisions. This approach is rare outside of very large foundations.
Investment consultant: The consultant provides advice, the committee makes recommendations, and the board grants final approval.
OCIO: The OCIO handles day-to-day investment decisions within the guidelines set by the Investment Policy Statement (IPS).
2. Capacity: someone has to do the work
Today, an OCIO’s responsibilities fall into two main areas: investments and operations, reflecting both the role's complexity and flexibility. On the investment side, the OCIO makes key portfolio decisions such as hiring and firing asset managers, setting tactical asset allocation, and rebalancing the portfolio to capitalize on market shifts and short-term opportunities. On the operations side, the OCIO handles tasks like completing paperwork for asset management funds, raising cash, and maintaining important documents, including K-1s and AML/KYC verifications.
3. Clarity: why the portfolio is built this way
What is our portfolio strategy, and why have we chosen it?
How does our portfolio support the organization’s mission and fund our spending?
Who is responsible for decisions about objectives, asset allocation, manager selection, and money movements?
How will we monitor the portfolio’s performance and progress over time?
4. Communication: meetings that connect the numbers to strategy
Quarterly meetings can easily drift into simply reviewing performance reports and discussing recent market movements. To keep meetings valuable and strategic for fiduciaries, consider these best practices:
Revisit the reasoning behind the strategy every year.
Focus on one topic per meeting to build shared understanding of strategies and managers, so that any negative performance is seen in context.
Document the rationale behind each decision, so new members inherit not just the portfolio, but also the reasoning and context for past choices.
5. Composition: building the right board for investment oversight
A strong investment board is made up of trustees who are prepared to make decisions, do their homework before meetings, and ask insightful questions. Effective boards benefit from a diversity of perspectives, not just investment expertise. Members from different professional and personal backgrounds can contribute valuable questions and viewpoints, strengthening oversight and decision-making.
Northern Trust's guidance for nonprofit directors covers several habits of strong boards, including: know the documents, bring in experts, "govern, don't manage," and build and renew the board.
Questions for your next committee meeting:
Capacity: Who is responsible for key tasks, and where do we have gaps?
Clarity: Can every trustee explain why the portfolio is structured this way and how it is expected to perform?
Communication: Do our meetings foster true understanding, or do they simply report information?
Composition: Do we have the right mix of people and perspectives at the table?
Thank you to Philanthropy Southeast for hosting this event and to Anne Davis for sharing her valuable insights and dual perspectives.
Back